I was talking (you know us barbecue guys, we like to talk) amongst a few friends and the topic of competition chicken came up. I was surprised how passionate everyone was with their opinion on this. From whether this or that should be allowed, the arguments for or against breasts and whether tenderness needed to be scored differently (we'd been drinking a little), the making of chicken balls (boneless thighs in a little ball), whether skin should or shouldn't be presented, or skin allowed to be removed if the judge doesn't like it, I think we hit most everything. It was towards the end of this lively conversation when I asked rather rhetorically "Is chicken actually barbecue"? There was some laughter, and I went on: Barbecue, traditional or otherwise, is the result of the act of barbecuing, which is low and slow cooking over wood. In competitions it's RARE that any competitor cooks chicken low and slow. Most are cooking over 300 degrees; some being significantly higher than this. Grill marks, for example, are a little clue here. We've got competitors pseudo-frying skin to get it usable for their purposes. So, it all begs the question: Is the resulting meat product actually barbecue? If not, should it be a meat category at all (in a sanctioned barbecue competition)?
This isn't anti-KCBS. Not all barbecue sanctioning bodies have chicken as a sanctioned meat, but many do.
I was talking (you know us barbecue guys, we like to talk) amongst a few friends and the topic of competition chicken came up. I was surprised how passionate everyone was with their opinion on this. From whether this or that should be allowed, the arguments for or against breasts and whether tenderness needed to be scored differently (we'd been drinking a little), the making of chicken balls (boneless thighs in a little ball), whether skin should or shouldn't be presented, or skin allowed to be removed if the judge doesn't like it, I think we hit most everything. It was towards the end of this lively conversation when I asked rather rhetorically "Is chicken actually barbecue"? There was some laughter, and I went on: Barbecue, traditional or otherwise, is the result of the act of barbecuing, which is low and slow cooking over wood. In competitions it's RARE that any competitor cooks chicken low and slow. Most are cooking over 300 degrees; some being significantly higher than this. Grill marks, for example, are a little clue here. We've got competitors pseudo-frying skin to get it usable for their purposes. So, it all begs the question: Is the resulting meat product actually barbecue? If not, should it be a meat category at all (in a sanctioned barbecue competition)?
6 Comments
Craig
6/14/2011 09:26:53 am
I cook chicken in the smoker for 2 1/2 hours and 225-250 degrees with smoke from wood. The last 15 minutes are cooked with sauce in the smoker and then gets the "grill" marks. These are not from a grill, but from the rack in the smoker.
Reply
Geoff
6/23/2011 09:14:55 am
Chicken most definitely is considered bbq. BUT, what is turned in as "bbq chicken" at comps, is not really bbq chicken. It's really injected, brined, glazed with sauce, etc.
Reply
Rookie'48
6/26/2011 03:40:35 pm
In the truest sense chicken probably isn't real BBQ. But some sactioning bodies have a chicken catagory & I don't think that's going to change any time soon.
Reply
The Smoke Ring
6/28/2011 08:11:37 am
Most of us agree that the definition of barbecue is meat slow roasted over wood coals. No, most chicken turned in at competitions is not barbecue. But neither are the other meats turned in at a "barbecue" competition. Chicken slow cooked in a smoker at low temperatures definitely fits the definition of barbecue. Chicken poached in butter in an aluminum pan isn't barbecue in my opinion. Neither is brisket or pork wrapped in foil and cooked at 400 degrees. It seems that judges have been conditioned to expect chicken to look the way it looks when cooked in a pan. I submitted some pictures of our boxes to your "judge my box" and several of the comments on our chicken said that it was too dark and even looked burnt. It is dark because it was cooked in a smoker at 235 degrees for 3 hours, not in a pool of butter or margarine in an aluminum pan covered with foil. It is barbecued chicken. So, we are being scored down on appearance, and who knows about taste, for cooking barbecue instead of poached chicken. Competition cooks have pushed the envelope, and redefined (at least in the minds of some judges) the definition of barbecue.
Reply
Dean
7/28/2011 11:45:12 am
I never really thought about chicken not being BBQ. Thanks for giving your perspective.
Reply
Hance
8/20/2011 02:21:18 am
Thanks folks; all very good points. It's definitely more rhetorically asked and pondering.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Hance Patrick
|