Brisket Box 144
1/15/2013 10:45:48 pm
Another bad picture. If you'd flip the box around you could get a better look at the meat. Slices and ends look good but color is questionable. In person I'd probably score this an 8, possibly higher.
1/15/2013 11:35:23 pm
score=7 box upside down and poor presentation, too dark, unappetizing
1/15/2013 11:37:48 pm
6 Picture quality is too poor to properly judge. Slices are uneven and not evenly placed in box.
Gerard den Bakker
1/15/2013 11:40:17 pm
9 Nice full box. I defenitely like the way the slices are cut.
1/16/2013 12:10:16 am
6. May be higher in person. Looks very dark. Please take the picture from the judges' perspective.
jim v mcbj
1/16/2013 12:13:21 am
8 looks fine other than being photographed upside down. if that red color is sauce it looks kind of strange. i would liked to have had a better view of the first piece next to the burnt ends.
1/16/2013 12:23:33 am
Score 8: Photo should have been taken so we can see the meat and not just the edges; looks moist, but has a very artificial red color (image quality?)
jaja01 KCBS cmbj
1/16/2013 12:43:14 am
6 - It would be better is the box was rotated 180 degrees so the picture was take from the front thus showing the meat better. The meat looks pretty red, either very rare or a color color was added. The ends look over done. This presentation does not entice me.
BlueSmoke KCBS CBJ/COMP COOK
1/16/2013 01:00:46 am
Holy creamation. Charred burnt ends.The top ends of the slices are over done. May be over sauced.........6
1/16/2013 01:07:53 am
I would give this a 7. Meat looks burnt. May taste otherwise though.
1/16/2013 02:25:29 am
7 Uncertain about this one, slices appear uneven thickness, coloring inconsistent.
1/16/2013 02:39:23 am
appears to have way to much sauce. The dark pieces im assuming is supposed to be burnt ends and that isn't it.
1/16/2013 02:46:15 am
7 - Picture is to dark to be sure, ends look too dark, flat looks over sauced.
1/16/2013 02:46:18 am
Hard to see layered that direction. Burnt ends look very dark. 7. Maybe 8 in person
1/16/2013 03:36:31 am
Hard to tell with the lighting but i'm sure it looks great in person 8
John - KCBS/MCBJ, CTC, Rep; MBN & MABA Judge
1/16/2013 03:58:16 am
6 - It's difficult to evaluate this box properly because the camera's point of view is not the judges' point of view. In effect, we are being asked to judge this box by looking over its shoulder. Doing so requires the judge to mentally rotate the image to imagine what it might look like from the front. Maybe we get it right, then again, maybe not. The slices look nice but rather haphazardly placed to me. I suspect this box would score higher at the judging table. Maybe even as much as an 8.
Dan KCBS CTC,MCBJ
1/16/2013 04:29:07 am
1/16/2013 04:36:28 am
Score 9 - I'm not used to viewing a box from this angle when judging, but I would vary much like to taste this dark meat.
Doug KCBS MCBJ & CTC
1/16/2013 05:13:09 am
Hard to see the meat with the photo from the back of the box. From the photo I'd give it a 7 maybe an 8. If I could see from the front the score would probably be higher. Can't really judge what we can't see.
Scott - KCBS CBJ
1/16/2013 05:58:07 am
6. The burnt ends look charred. Placement of the slices makes it difficult to judge. I can't really see the meat well and it looks very heavily sauced. The slices do look moist and are evenly sized and placed.
1/16/2013 06:00:25 am
five--and that is for the pic only--really can't judge the beef
Tom - CBJ w/ KCBS, MBN, NCPC & comp cook
1/16/2013 06:12:55 am
1/16/2013 08:56:08 am
Bad Pic and Burnt look = no score from me........
Bill C. MCBJ/CTC KCBS
1/16/2013 09:07:46 am
7. Slices are oversauced. Can't really see the burnt ends to properly evaluate them. They look burned (no pun intended).
1/16/2013 11:47:41 am
6 - Maybe it's the camera but this is not a good presentation.
Paul (KCBS CBJ & Cook)
1/16/2013 12:54:50 pm
This one's an 8 in my book, the burnt ends are a little literal looking burnt and only a taste should dictate a flavor & tenderness. But at first glance, I'd lean towards a little blacker burnt than necessary and the box is judged as a whole.
Ed KCBS MCBJ
1/17/2013 01:05:37 am
Nice full box of apparently well cooked meat! Stacking the slices
Matt KCBS CBJ
1/17/2013 01:17:38 am
8 - Maybe a 9 in person. I think its the picture that makes the burnt ends look a little on the overcooked side. I'd make sure and arrange the slices evenly, but other than that, great book. Makes me hungry!
Jim H - CBJ SBN/KCBS
1/17/2013 01:20:49 am
7-8 Another bad picture (maybe it's my computer) but it looks good as far as I can tell. However, the color of the meat appears to be sauce-related and, as such, you can't tell what the meat looks like except for the burnt ends! More care to placement could be taken as well.
Scott A. KCBS/CBJ
1/17/2013 08:58:31 pm
6 maybe 7 or possibly 8 in person
Deb KCBS MCBJ/CTC
1/18/2013 03:25:40 am
Sully CBJ 3145
1/19/2013 06:21:28 am
7 what is all that black on the left on all the slices?? not very appealing burnt ends look way too burnt for me. Just because they call them burnt ends doesn't mean your supposed to burn them
1/19/2013 12:41:42 pm
The red color for brisket just does not look natural to me. That and the appearance of too much sauce. Score 7
Comments are closed.
WELCOME to the Judge My Box section on BBQ Critic. This is a great place for competition cooks to submit boxes and get feedback on appearance scores from Certified BBQ Judges. Judges also improve their judging skills by learning from each other. Thanks for stopping by and l hope you find this site to be useful in all your BBQ competition endeavors.
Publisher, BBQ Critic
KCBS Certified Master BBQ Judge
KCBS Certified Table Captain
Archives by Group
Famous Dave Interview
Online BBQ Judge Sign-up
You are REQUIRED to register as a BBQ Critic Online Judge to be allowed to judge boxes on this site. Click here to sign up now.
CERTIFIED BBQ JUDGES:
Please score this BBQ Competition box using the KCBS scoring system below.
1-DISQUALIFIED (give reason).
Click on BOX # in title of post above photo. Fill out the "LEAVE A REPLY" form and use the following format to TITLE each section in your post:
NAME FIELD ON FORM:
State name/CBJ Organization (i.e, Tom - CBJ/KCBS). CBJ=Certified BBQ Judge
EMAIL FIELD ON FORM:
You must be a "registered" BBQ Critic Online Judge in order to judge boxes on this site. Proof of registration is your email. All registered judges are required add their email to the email form field. Emails are kept private and not published. If you do not list your email, your score/post will not appear on the site.
SCORE/REASONS FOR SCORE: Score this entry and give reasons for your score. DO NOT mention garnish or smoke rings in your reasons for scoring. We judge meat only.
SUGGESTIONS: Feel free to offer any suggestions on how to improve the box (keep separate from reasons why you scored the box). You can mention anything here such as garnish suggestions.
The purpose of BBQ Critic's JudgeMyBox section is to provide feedback to competition cooks. Certified BBQ Judges who visit this site will score the photo of a contest box (using KCBS judging rules) and may optionally leave a comment explaining their score.
The idea is to allow the cook to get inside the mind of a judge (judges do have varying opinions) so they can use this information to help improve scores on APPEARANCE.
In turn, the BBQ Critic editorial team will provide feedback on some judge scores and commentary that stray from the KCBS rules. This will help our judges become better judges and keeps everyone on the same page. Judges may also encounter some fun challenges at times (click for example).
Comments about boxes or judges scores may be discussed in our online FORUM in a respectful manner.
Please be mindful that scoring photo boxes may not be as accurate as scoring the box in person. Lighting, glare, angles, etc may affect the overall score. Judges also have more time to stare at your box, so that means we may get very detailed about the good and the bad.
Have fun, judges! Oh, and cooks? Please send us your boxes. We love to judge Q here at BBQ Critic. ;-)
Archives by Month