Judge My Box

Pork - Box 46

9/25/2011

When scoring this BBQ Competition box, please use the KCBS scoring system below. Team names are kept confidential. 9-Excellent, 8-Very Good, 7-Above Average, 6-Average, 5-Below Average, 4-Poor, 3-Bad,, 2-Inedible, 1-DISQUALIFIED (give reason)

TO POST SCORE: Click on BOX # in title of post above photo. Fill out the "LEAVE A REPLY" form with the following information:

1) State if you are a Certified BBQ Judge or not by your name (i.e, Tom - CBJ)
2) SCORE the entry.
3) REASONS: List reasons for your score to communicate to the cook.
4) SUGGESTIONS: Feel free to offer suggestions on how to improve the box (keep separate from "reasons")
5) Your score and comment will appear online after approved by the admin.

22 Comments

Tom (CBJ-KCBS, MBN, NCPC & cook)

9/26/2011 01:33:53 am

Score = 9

Reason = Looks mighty good and appetizing! I like the use of three different "types" of pork in the box. Looks moist and the slices look SWEET.

Suggestions = Watch overdoing the sauce on the pulled portion in the middle. Some of the garnish looks "un-tucked" and can detract from the looks of the meat.

Jim - (CBJ,KCBS)

9/26/2011 03:34:45 am

Score = 8

Reason = Not a lot of care taken in meat appearance to make this a choice of execellence. Bottom row of meat does not look that great (could be the photo, but not entirely)

Suggestions = First off, take a more clear photo next time. STraighten out that bottom row. More meat may make this box better lokoing as well.

9/26/2011 08:29:34 am

CBJ

7

Josh

9/26/2011 09:05:50 am

8

Could be the picture, but the surface of the meat almost looks like there are sugar crystals or something on it. Meat looks really appetizing except for that.

CBJ

Tim link

9/26/2011 09:10:00 am

9
Yes, there are things that keep it form being perfect, but c'mon guys, if this isn't a 9, what is?

A 9 is supposed to be excellent, not perfect.

This is excellent!

2fat

9/26/2011 10:07:04 am

9(nine)--looks good(considering pic)

Abel CBJ link

9/26/2011 10:30:09 am

I give it a 7 sauce on top portion is sloppy, messy, and unnecessary.

CBJ

Keith - (KCBS CBJ/CTC)

9/26/2011 10:33:39 am

Pros - I like it when the pork comes with three types. It ensures an all-around accurate idea of how that cook's pork tastes for when that part of the judging comes around. It also just looks so much better.

Cons - Just one and it is the garnish. I don't feel any is needed but understand why it is used. I wouldn't count off for mixing lettuce and parsley (and not doing it very neatly) but I'm not a fan.

I think this box looks Excellent and I would score it a 9.

BJ-CBJ

9/26/2011 11:17:12 am

Solid 8, symetry of the bottom row pieces would be my only fault.

buzz--cbj

9/26/2011 11:34:48 am

@tim well said-- A 9 is supposed to be excellent, not perfect.

Liz CBJ

9/26/2011 12:16:19 pm

8 nearly a 9
Like the arrangement and variety. Less sauce on the money muscle would be better. Looks tasty!

Kendall

9/26/2011 02:35:42 pm

CBJ

I'd give it an 8 because of the way the sauce application looks on the pieces in the top of the box in the picture. In real life it may earn a 9.

I'm not judging it down because it's not perfect, but because I think the cook could have done a better job on that one point. Everything else about this box looks great.

Peter

9/26/2011 07:00:42 pm

Nothing to get excited about. "Mealy" comes to mind.
6
cbj

Rob - KCBS CBJ\Comp Cook

9/26/2011 11:47:38 pm

7 - If the picture quality would have been better or if I had seen this box in person, I probably would have scored this box higher. Even though we are only scoring the meat, the garnish plays a part in how appetizing the entry looks. In this case, I think the granish sort of detracts from how good the meat looks. Consider the garnish a frame for your picture, not a major part of the picture. More meat in the box would have made this entry look better. Also, the slices look a little over-sauced IMO.

smokeadelic - KCBS cook and CBJ

9/27/2011 01:13:19 am

9.
I would appreciate more meat in the box and a little less sauce on the money muscle....but still an excellent submission.

Hance - MIM/MBN/GBA CBJ and comp cook

9/27/2011 03:34:42 am

7

Agree with Rob, picture quality isn't helping. Might've been an 8. However, frankly, there's not enough meat in the box. This allows too much green showing and frankly it's distracting and taking away from the appearance of the meat. The sauce appears heavy and gloppy.

mkevenson

9/27/2011 04:39:20 am

CBJ

8

The middle and front section of meat looks "greasy". Perhaps the photo exposure.
Garnish overpowers meat but small adjustment in amount of meat in box will help that.

Scott Simpson - KCBS CBJ

9/27/2011 07:02:57 am

8

Slices look like they're covered thick with sauce. Arrangment seems odd, almost looks like an "A". So much green in the box, I'd rather see more meat than green but the meat looks very appetizing and I want some!

Dick

9/27/2011 07:19:57 am

Score 7. Two different colors with the garnish and three different meats make this box look confusing. The amount of the meat and the layout also make this box look stingy. Money muscle sauce is too heavy and hides the meat.

Tim

9/28/2011 03:09:09 am

CBJ

7

Sauce on slices too thick and uneven.
Uneven presentation accross bottom.

Big_AL

9/28/2011 05:39:07 am

Big AL SLBS CBJ

8

The pulled has a mushy look. Piece two from the left of the burnt ends looks out of place. Otherwise nice box.

elkski

9/29/2011 11:07:18 am

looks good to me... 8.5 = 9

Archives by Group

Famous Dave Interview

READ THE REVIEW

Online BBQ Judge Sign-up

You are REQUIRED to register as a BBQ Critic Online Judge to be allowed to judge boxes on this site. Click here to sign up now.

Posting Instructions

CERTIFIED BBQ JUDGES:
Please score this BBQ Competition box using the KCBS scoring system below.

9-Excellent
8-Very Good
7-Above Average
6-Average
5-Below Average
4-Poor
3-Bad
2-Inedible
1-DISQUALIFIED (give reason).

Click on BOX # in title of post above photo. Fill out the "LEAVE A REPLY" form and use the following format to TITLE each section in your post:

NAME FIELD ON FORM:
State name/CBJ Organization (i.e, Tom - CBJ/KCBS). CBJ=Certified BBQ Judge

EMAIL FIELD ON FORM:
You must be a "registered" BBQ Critic Online Judge in order to judge boxes on this site. Proof of registration is your email. All registered judges are required add their email to the email form field. Emails are kept private and not published. If you do not list your email, your score/post will not appear on the site.

SCORE/REASONS FOR SCORE: Score this entry and give reasons for your score. DO NOT mention garnish or smoke rings in your reasons for scoring. We judge meat only.

SUGGESTIONS: Feel free to offer any suggestions on how to improve the box (keep separate from reasons why you scored the box). You can mention anything here such as garnish suggestions.

Submit a Box

Want to submit a pic of your BBQ competition box? Click here.

Purpose

The purpose of BBQ Critic's JudgeMyBox section is to provide feedback to competition cooks. Certified BBQ Judges who visit this site will score the photo of a contest box (using KCBS judging rules) and may optionally leave a comment explaining their score.

The idea is to allow the cook to get inside the mind of a judge (judges do have varying opinions) so they can use this information to help improve scores on APPEARANCE.

In turn, the BBQ Critic editorial team will provide feedback on some judge scores and commentary that stray from the KCBS rules. This will help our judges become better judges and keeps everyone on the same page. Judges may also encounter some fun challenges at times (click for example).

Comments about boxes or judges scores may be discussed in our online FORUM in a respectful manner.

Please be mindful that scoring photo boxes may not be as accurate as scoring the box in person. Lighting, glare, angles, etc may affect the overall score. Judges also have more time to stare at your box, so that means we may get very detailed about the good and the bad.

Have fun, judges! Oh, and cooks? Please send us your boxes. We love to judge Q here at BBQ Critic. ;-)